Re^3: Unclosed tags in posts

if you, personally, always want to see balanced html tags, then check the box, and you will always see balanced html tags, regardless of who wrote the node, or how diligent they were about balancing their html tags.

I personally believe I should apologize: my fault for virtually never checking the settings. The point is, it seems there are so many of them, perhaps even too many, often with poorly chosen defaults. This is in contrast with Perl's philosophy itself, which is much about intellegently chosen defaults. Who could possibly not want to see balanced html tags? And even if one such person exists, then why is (s)he given the right to screw up the view for anyone else?

--
If you can't understand the incipit, then please check the IPB Campaign.

Comment on Re^3: Unclosed tags in posts Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Unclosed tags in posts by hossman (Prior) on May 30, 2008 at 20:53 UTC
And even if one such person exists, then why is (s)he given the right to screw up the view for anyone else? No one is given the right to screw up anything for anyone else ... if i leave the box unchecked, and i post garbage posts with crappy unclosed tags, that doesn't screw anything up for you as long as you have the box checked. If however post content was "auto-fixed" on creation, that would "screw up" the original content for anyone who wanted to see it. I won't dispute an argument that the default value for users should be "checked", mainly because i have no idea what the default value is for new users ... i suspect when the feature was added it was left unchecked for existing users so as to be backwards compatible and not change existing behavior (which also fits into the Perl philosophy) PS: I regard to a Private Message i received about whether or not the XML view would show you the original intent: that's not going to help you if you change the content when it's created, that's why "Enforce proper nesting of HTML" is a display setting.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^4: Unclosed tags in posts
by hossman (Prior) on May 30, 2008 at 20:53 UTC

And even if one such person exists, then why is (s)he given the right to screw up the view for anyone else?

No one is given the right to screw up anything for anyone else ... if i leave the box unchecked, and i post garbage posts with crappy unclosed tags, that doesn't screw anything up for you as long as you have the box checked.

If however post content was "auto-fixed" on creation, that would "screw up" the original content for anyone who wanted to see it.

I won't dispute an argument that the default value for users should be "checked", mainly because i have no idea what the default value is for new users ... i suspect when the feature was added it was left unchecked for existing users so as to be backwards compatible and not change existing behavior (which also fits into the Perl philosophy)

PS: I regard to a Private Message i received about whether or not the XML view would show you the original intent: that's not going to help you if you *change* the content when it's created, that's why "Enforce proper nesting of HTML" is a *display* setting.

[reply]