in reply to Re: The golf course looks great, my swing feels good, I like my chances (Part I)
in thread The golf course looks great, my swing feels good, I like my chances (Part I)

So, can we expect to see lots of people with 58-char answers in the Roman to Decimal list after this? :)
53 strokes after the next article. :) It'll be interesting to see what effect this has on the game. I might add there's a good chance I'll lose the lead if one of the leading golfers combines my solutions with his/hers to produce a shorter one. Based on the "99 bottles of beer" game though, I don't expect many folks to post my solutions under their name. After all, in that game, you can easily google for a 174-char solution (not posted by me) for 10th place on the leaderboard yet there are around 900 golfers with scores worse than that. Having said that, I just noticed there are twelve golfers on 174, which does seem rather a lot. :)

FWIW, here are my reasons for publishing my solutions now:

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: The golf course looks great, my swing feels good, I like my chances (Part I)
by ambrus (Abbot) on May 01, 2009 at 11:20 UTC

    The codegolf site is still on perl 5.8.8 yet states "All languages will be kept relatively up to date as new versions are released". They probably should upgrade to perl 5.10.x, yet if they do that say versus print and other issues will make the current games unfair.

    Even if they change to 5.10.x, you need an explicit -M5.01 or -E: option to be able to use say, wouldn't you? The -e option is implicit so you can't just replace it to -E.

    Also it might be better to keep the older versions of languages as alternatives there too, unless that takes too much effort, so as not to break solutions like that in The golf course looks great, my swing feels good, I like my chances (Part II) by replacing ruby 1.8 with 1.9.

    I do agree that it would help to upgrade the languages though, in some other cases it can definitely help cut characters from solutions.