in reply to Re: Illegal octal digit error
in thread Illegal octal digit error

This is a great post by Grandfather!
There is an important part he illustrated that might get missed...notice that there are 8 hash assignment statements, but only 7 lines in printout. What happened? The $hash{10} = 'ten'; statement caused the numeric ten to be converted to string for use as a hash key. The $hash{'10'} = "'ten'"; statement generated the same key and caused 10's value to be overwritten.

So what that means is that if you use a numeric value as a hash key, Perl will convert it to a string. There will not be any leading zeroes in that string!

The poster looks like he wants a table to translate a number into text months. I suspect that putting '08' in quotes is unlikely to be the best thing here and that the first reply "get rid of the leading zero" is probably better because I suspect this "8" will come from a numeric routine (like a time function) and if it doesn't (like from a webpage, etc) there is any easy way to "get rid of leading zeroes".

In Perl everything is a string until used in a numeric context. The below shows one trick that I sometimes use to "delete leading zeroes" without regex...See example 1, this just adds "0" to the string! Example 2 shows some pitfalls of comparing numeric values as strings! Example 3 show's Grandfather's 8 vs 7 keys with another example. The hash lookup needs a string and makes a string if it needs to for use in calculating the actual binary hash key.

#EXAMPLE 1 my $a = "0001"; print "a 1 as string is:$a\n"; $a+=0; # A trick! forces numeric context!!! print "a 1 as number is:$a\n"; #EXAMPLE 2 my $b="01"; if ($a eq $b) { print "$a is eq $b\n"; } else { print "$a is NOT eq $b\n"; } if ($a == $b) { print "$a is == $b\n"; } else { print "$a is NOT == $b\n"; } #EAMPLE 3 my $string_eight="8"; my $numeric_eight = 8;
if ($string_eight eq $b) { print "string $string_eight is eq number $numeric_eight\n"; } else { print "string $string_eight is NOT eq number $numeric_eight\n"; }
my %hash = ('8'=>"string eight", 8 =>'number 8'); print "hash key uses the stringified version of 8: $hash{'8'} or $hash +{$numeric_eight}\n"; __END__ a 1 as string is:0001 a 1 as number is:1 1 is NOT eq 01 1 is == 01
#string 8 is NOT eq number 8</strike>
hash key uses the stringified version of 8: number 8 or number 8

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Illegal octal digit error
by ig (Vicar) on Jun 06, 2009 at 22:33 UTC

    I had some fun with numeric keys, then explored the surprising string 8 is NOT eq number 8, not realizing until much later the cause of this result: if ($string_eight eq $b).

    After all, $string_eight and $numeric_eight are 'eq'. And, as I expected, the 'eq' operator causes stringification of the numeric value.

    use strict; use warnings; use Data::Dumper; use Devel::Peek; my %hash = ( 1e2 => '100', 100 => '100', 0x64 => '100', 0144 => '100', ); print Dumper(\%hash); my $string_eight = '8'; my $numeric_eight = 8; print "\n\$numeric_eight before use with 'eq'\n"; Dump($numeric_eight); if ($string_eight eq $numeric_eight) { print "'eq'\n"; } else { print "not 'eq'\n"; } print "\n\$numeric_eight after use with 'eq'\n"; Dump($numeric_eight); print "\n\$numeric_eight = $numeric_eight\n"; print "\n\$numeric_eight after use in a string (i.e. stringification)\ +n"; Dump($numeric_eight); if ($string_eight eq $numeric_eight) { print "not 'eq'\n"; } else { print "'eq'\n"; } print "\n\$string_eight then \$numeric_eight after all\n"; Dump($string_eight); Dump($numeric_eight); __END__ $VAR1 = { '100' => '100' }; $numeric_eight before use with 'eq' SV = IV(0x97df82c) at 0x97df830 REFCNT = 1 FLAGS = (PADMY,IOK,pIOK) IV = 8 'eq' $numeric_eight after use with 'eq' SV = PVIV(0x97e01b8) at 0x97df830 REFCNT = 1 FLAGS = (PADMY,IOK,POK,pIOK,pPOK) <-- note POK is now set IV = 8 PV = 0x97ee168 "8"\0 <-- and there is now a PV, CUR + and LEN as well as IV CUR = 1 LEN = 4 $numeric_eight = 8 $numeric_eight after use in a string (i.e. stringification) SV = PVIV(0x97e01b8) at 0x97df830 REFCNT = 1 FLAGS = (PADMY,IOK,POK,pIOK,pPOK) IV = 8 PV = 0x97ee168 "8"\0 CUR = 1 LEN = 4 not 'eq' $string_eight then $numeric_eight after all SV = PV(0x98339d8) at 0x98736e8 REFCNT = 1 FLAGS = (PADMY,POK,pPOK) PV = 0x97e4ba0 "8"\0 CUR = 1 LEN = 4 SV = PVIV(0x97e01b8) at 0x97df830 REFCNT = 1 FLAGS = (PADMY,IOK,POK,pIOK,pPOK) IV = 8 PV = 0x97ee168 "8"\0 CUR = 1 LEN = 4
      Yes, there was a typo!

      Sorry. You are correct and in line with the general thrust of my post, "don't use string '08' as the hash key".

      #EXAMPLE 3A my $string_eight="08"; my $numeric_eight = 8; if ($string_eight eq $numeric_eight) { print "string $string_eight is eq number $numeric_eight\n"; } else { print "string $string_eight is NOT eq number $numeric_eight\n"; } #Example 3B if ($string_eight == $numeric_eight) { print "string $string_eight is == number $numeric_eight\n"; } else { print "string $string_eight is NOT == number $numeric_eight\n"; } __END__ string 08 is NOT eq number 8 string 08 is == number 8
      Ooops....
Re^3: Illegal octal digit error
by druud (Sexton) on Jun 08, 2009 at 18:12 UTC
    perl -MData::Dumper -wle' my $r = { 010 => 123, 8 => 456 }; $r->{ 011 } = 789; print Dumper $r; ' $VAR1 = { '8' => 456, '9' => 789 };