Re^4: What are the drawbacks of autobox?

Well I brought a list of arguments and you answer with your personal "findings"?

>While the language may seem clearer and in theory easier to understand, ...

Wasn't "make frequent things easy to code" a Perl mantra?

> Basically, if you want "Ruby" style code, then you can cut out the middle man and code in Ruby.

Silly me, and I thought TIMTOWTDI is Perl's style to code... ;-)

I'm curious what would your answer become if I edit my posts to s/Ruby/Perl6/g ?

Cheers Rolf

BTW your not answering the OP about autobox and I never propagated that others should code this way!

Comment on Re^4: What are the drawbacks of autobox?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: What are the drawbacks of autobox? by DrHyde (Prior) on Mar 02, 2010 at 10:47 UTC
One thing that most people forget is that TIMTOWTDI doesn't mean "There Is More Than One Way To Do It". It means "There Is More Than One Way To Do It (but most of them are wrong)".	[reply]
Re^6: What are the drawbacks of autobox? by LanX (Saint) on Mar 02, 2010 at 12:03 UTC
> "There Is More Than One Way To Do It (but most of them are wrong)". You believe in absolute truth ? Rather conservative, isn't it? ;-) Cheers Rolf	[reply]