Re^4: XML::Twig Text replacement

There are actually 3 ways of dealing with namespaces, 2 of which are supported by XML::Twig:

proper support, your second example, which is correct, but verbose as you have to associated namespace URIs to prefixes; I also suspect that it is not as robust as one would expect, I don't quite trust those URIs to not change sneakily, especially for the default namespace,
ignore namespace declarations is XML::Twig's default mode, there foo:ele is the element by that name, and ele is just ele, whether it is assigned a default namespace or not, you think of this as inconsistent,
drop all namespaces, which is your first example, there foo:ele is seen as ele; I had never thought of that option, I could add it, but I strongly suspect that it would be one favored only by users who care about namespaces, and already use map_xmlns (or XML::LibXML!),

For XML::Twig, consistency is not as important as convenience, and I the current behaviour seems to be convenient for most users. I'll look into adding an option to just drop namespaces, it should not be too difficult, but I am not sure how useful it would be.

Comment on Re^4: XML::Twig Text replacement

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: XML::Twig Text replacement by ikegami (Patriarch) on May 03, 2010 at 15:44 UTC
There are actually 3 ways of dealing with namespace "Drop" and "ignore" mean the same thing. At the very least, the difference is ambiguous. Let's clarify: Standard support (verbose) Ignore namespace declarations (assume everything is in the null namespace) Ignore namespace declarations and make prefixes significant. The last is XML::Twig's default. It also supports the first. For XML::Twig, consistency is not as important as convenience That's exactly the point I was making. Prefixes are arbitrary strings that can and do change from document to document. The employment of a default namespace also can and does change from document to document. It would very convenient if it could ignore namespaces, but it doesn't have a way of doing that. Instead of just ignoring namespaces, the default is to make make the prefix significant. Not only is that a step in the wrong direction, it makes it unusable in theory and in practice. Being unable to use XML::Twig under common circumstances is not convenient at all.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^5: XML::Twig Text replacement
by ikegami (Patriarch) on May 03, 2010 at 15:44 UTC

There are actually 3 ways of dealing with namespace

"Drop" and "ignore" mean the same thing. At the very least, the difference is ambiguous. Let's clarify:

Standard support (verbose)
Ignore namespace declarations (assume everything is in the null namespace)
Ignore namespace declarations and make prefixes significant.

The last is XML::Twig's default. It also supports the first.

For XML::Twig, consistency is not as important as convenience

That's exactly the point I was making.

Prefixes are arbitrary strings that can and do change from document to document. The employment of a default namespace also can and does change from document to document.

It would very convenient if it could ignore namespaces, but it doesn't have a way of doing that. Instead of just ignoring namespaces, the default is to make make the prefix significant. Not only is that a step in the wrong direction, it makes it unusable in theory and in practice.

Being unable to use XML::Twig under common circumstances is not convenient at all.

[reply]