in reply to Re^2: Site facelift?
in thread Site facelift?

Howdy, come on. These examples are for media companies and advertising websites, nobody thinks perlmonks should look like that. Someone competent and talented propose to work for the website, and you just diss him? How about getting constructive?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Site facelift?
by luis.roca (Deacon) on Nov 19, 2010 at 19:49 UTC

         These examples are for media companies and advertising websites, nobody thinks perlmonks should look like that.

    Least of all me. I've spent years designing for entertainment industry clients. Projects like PerlMonks.org is just the kind of refreshing change I've been looking for. I posted my portfolio simply as proof that I am who I say I am. NOT as a suggestion that PerlMonks should be designed using Nickelodeon orange with a giant space robot intro animation.

    Now, a flying monk Flash intro — hmmmmmmm — maybe. ;)

    "...the adversities born of well-placed thoughts should be considered mercies rather than misfortunes." — Don Quixote
[reply]
      Please!

      NO Flash

      Bandwidth hogging; exploitable.

[reply]
             

        NO Flash

        You're preaching to the choir. (at least with me.) I've never liked Flash. Even when it cost me freelance work, I just fought harder for the HTML/CSS jobs. I would n e v e r do this site, it's member and myself such a disservice.

        "...the adversities born of well-placed thoughts should be considered mercies rather than misfortunes." — Don Quixote
[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion