in reply to Re: What is "aggressive" argument?
in thread What is "aggressive" argument?
Your problem isn't new.
Hm. (Inevitably:) You're wrong. Or, you might be right, but not in the way you think.
You see, I know why people find me a disagreeable man. There are flavours of course, but mostly, it's because I am.
My only "problem" here is why other people think I should change. More importantly, why do they think that I should want to change.
This place isn't a part of my social life. Just a place where I pass time by attempting to solve interesting problems. As I said somewhere else in this thread, I find programming problems infinitely more interesting and challenging than crosswords or sudoku. Every now and again something I post seems to help the OP and that's nice. And when it doesn't, that okay too, because I probably had fun doing it anyway.
I wish it were possible to have in-depth, technical discussions here, without people taking disagreement with their ideas, code or logic, as attacks on their person; or them resorting to attacks on my person when their technical arguments are exhausted or disproved. It used to be possible.
Just as a person does not have to be beautiful, to do something beautiful; they do not have to be stupid, to do or say something stupid. To say: "That is stupid" is not to say: "You are stupid"; but that distinction seems lost here these days.
I remember when I first came here, I was admonished: "Stop being so damn polite!". Well, this place has knocked it out of me. So, if those with whom I have disagreements, see me as "disagreeable" all I can do is own that.
Nice poem by the way.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: What is "aggressive" argument?
by Anonymous Monk on Nov 23, 2010 at 02:46 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Nov 23, 2010 at 03:11 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Nov 23, 2010 at 03:46 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Nov 23, 2010 at 04:16 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Nov 23, 2010 at 09:01 UTC | |
|