in reply to Analyzing a Perl application
This is, un-fortunately, one of those cases where “TMTOWTDI” can turn-around and bite you in the (!). There are many syntactically-different ways to express the same meaning in terms of source-code, and when you say, “are very similar,” you unfortunately (probably) mean, “means, or does, the same thing.” And that kind of analysis ... which BTW I have done many, many times ... requires “the human eye.”
I happen to have more-than-trivial knowledge of the arcane arts of “source code analysis,” having worked for an early-90’s startup that tried (in vain...) to do this sort of thing with COBOL. (They went public anyway, then of course went bust.) You can map out data-dependencies and control flows (as I have myself done recently, in another Meditation), but you cannot discern meaning.
Certainly, you can automatically scan source-code to build up a data-dictionary and a code-dictionary ... and this, for an app that might involve many hundreds or even thousands of source-components, can certainly be useful. These undertakings very quickly outstrip the limits of human visualization, even for the most spectacular of totally self-absorbed nerds.
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^2: Analyzing a Perl application
by szabgab (Priest) on Feb 01, 2011 at 06:56 UTC |