in reply to Re^3: DBIx::Class and Google Fusion Tables
in thread DBIx::Class and Google Fusion Tables

Yeah, I'm doing some dumps right now. Loader is going through some right now. Still looking for options to add to specify the storage engine or properties thereof.

It does look like the protocol either needs its own DBD module, or at least some way of loading the data into a in-memory DBI object. I'm probably going to continue down the path of a DBD::SNMP module.

So, does DBIx::Class support crossing storage types for relationships, or does that require parsing between the divisions yourself?
  • Comment on Re^4: DBIx::Class and Google Fusion Tables

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: DBIx::Class and Google Fusion Tables
by onelesd (Pilgrim) on Aug 30, 2011 at 00:02 UTC
    DBI has no problem crossing storage types and/or databases within a single RDBMS, but I'm not sure if it or DBIx::Class can span different instances out of the box. You could create an interface to the different schemas you have using multiple DBIx::Class::Schema objects. That does mean you would have to tie them together yourself, but it might not be so bad because you can extend the code dbicdump generated with your own methods.