Re^2: Way to do a "scalar ref"?

Hi,

Thanks for the reply. Ok, I'm working on a wiki (which can have VERY large articles in). The site also gets a lot of traffic (several million hits a month), so I need to make this code as optimized as possible. Now, lets say we have:

sub process_article {
    my $article = get_article_from_db($article_id);
    my $contents = process_article($article->{contents});
    # now I need to access $article->{contents}, but the modified vers
+ion from process_article
}

sub process_article {
    my $article_contents = $_[0];
    # do some stuff to $article_contents here
    return $article_contents;
}
[download]

..so basically I wanna be able to pass along $article_contents to different functions, but not actually have it take up more memory (or require a "return", to assign it to a new variable).

Does that make more sense?

TIA

Andy

Comment on Re^2: Way to do a "scalar ref"? Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Way to do a "scalar ref"? by moritz (Cardinal) on Sep 26, 2011 at 09:02 UTC
FWIW @_ and thus $_[0] are already aliases to the variable used in the call, so if you do something like `sub f { $_[0] =~ s/a/b/g } my $text = 'foo bar' f $text` [download] No copying happens. If you want explicit references, do it like this: `sub f { my $ref = shift; $$ref =~ s/a/b/g } my $text = 'foo bar' f \$text` [download] m working on a wiki (which can have VERY large articles in). The site also gets a lot of traffic (several million hits a month), so I need to make this code as optimized as possible. Then be sure to read perlperf, and cache wherever possible. If you cache the rendered version of very large articles, the number of renderings becomes proportional to the number of writes, which is usually much lower than the number or reads. Perl 6 - second systems done right	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: Way to do a "scalar ref"? by johngg (Canon) on Sep 26, 2011 at 09:13 UTC
You seem to have two `process_article` subroutines, should we assume the second ought to be called `process_article_contents`? Perhaps you could pass a reference to the hash value, something like this. `knoppix@Microknoppix:~$ perl -MData::Dumper -E ' > sub double { $rsVal = shift; $$rsVal *= 2 } > > $rhData = { one => 1, two => 2 }; > say Data::Dumper->Dumpxs( [ $rhData ], [ qw{ rhData } ] ); > > double( \ $rhData->{ two } ); > say Data::Dumper->Dumpxs( [ $rhData ], [ qw{ rhData } ] );' $rhData = { 'one' => 1, 'two' => 2 }; $rhData = { 'one' => 1, 'two' => 4 }; knoppix@Microknoppix:~$` [download] I hope this is helpful. Cheers, JohnGG	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: Way to do a "scalar ref"? by AnomalousMonk (Archbishop) on Sep 26, 2011 at 18:45 UTC
You can even save one more large, expensive copy operation by returning a reference to the scalar 'content' in the first place rather than the actual content (if you have editorial control over these functions) and just pass around the scalar reference thereafter. In the example below, the only copy performed is the absolutely necessary one (if you do not want to change the original content) associated with the first processing operation. (Update: Of course, you still have to come to terms with all the copying that goes on in all those `s///` operations, which may make the higher-level question moot.) `>perl -wMstrict -le "my $article = { content => 'FEE FIE FOE FUM' }; ;; print qq{'$article->{content}'}; my $sr = process_content($article); print qq{'$$sr'}; process_content_some_more($sr); print qq{'$$sr'}; ;; sub process_content { my ($hashref) = @_; (my $processed = $hashref->{content}) =~ s{(\w+)}{\L$1}xmsg; return \$processed; } ;; sub process_content_some_more { my ($scalarref) = @_; $$scalarref =~ s{(\w+)}{\u$1}xmsg; } " 'FEE FIE FOE FUM' 'fee fie foe fum' 'Fee Fie Foe Fum'` [download]	[reply] [d/l] [select]