Re^14: aXML vs TT2

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^15: aXML vs TT2 by Logicus (Initiate) on Oct 23, 2011 at 03:50 UTC
Yes it does, I don't understand why you can't understand this, I can only assume it's due to the fact that I have not yet written sufficiently detailed and explicit examples and explanations yet. If that is the case, then I'm sorry but your questions are just going to have to wait until I have time to do the documentation and compile a F.A.Q for people to refer to who find it difficult to understand for whatever reason.	[reply]
Re^16: aXML vs TT2 by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 23, 2011 at 05:16 UTC
Logicus: There's no problem Logicus: Here are solutions Logicus: There's no problem Logicus: I solved the problem years ago Logicus: I didn't acknowledge the problem Stop contradicting yourself!	[reply]
Re^17: aXML vs TT2 by Logicus (Initiate) on Oct 23, 2011 at 05:19 UTC
I have not contradicted myself. aXML is coming up on 5 years old, and is a turing complete, reliable, stable and easy to use / learn language for developing web apps in. Now that I have re-written it to use plack, I can add fast and efficient to that list as well.	[reply]