Re^23: aXML vs TT2

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^24: aXML vs TT2 by Logicus (Initiate) on Oct 23, 2011 at 06:40 UTC
That's a good suggestion however it wouldn't work. Once the <lt> tag has executed the document would then contain a valid <db_select> tag and the parser would pick up on it and execute it because it loops until it cannot find any more matches.	[reply]
Re^25: aXML vs TT2 by chromatic (Archbishop) on Oct 23, 2011 at 22:51 UTC
That's the concern ikegami has. It's a subtle concern, but it's an important one. This is one reason why, for example, Perl allows you to choose alternate delimiters for strings and regular expressions and substitutions. Without that, you might get stuck in a weird dimension of quoting, and without quoting, there are certain programs and pieces of data you can't represent. Improve your skills with Modern Perl: the free book.	[reply]
Re^26: aXML vs TT2 by Logicus (Initiate) on Oct 24, 2011 at 00:23 UTC
without quoting, there are certain programs and pieces of data you can't represent. I'm not sure specifically why, however I have a gut feeling that that comment is infact incorrect. You might have to write the program in a different way to what your used to, but I see no reason why you cannot get any output at all from aXML, by virtue of the fact that the plugins have the full expressivity of Perl itself, and aXML is therefore Turing complete.	[reply]
Re^27: aXML vs TT2 by chromatic (Archbishop) on Oct 24, 2011 at 05:25 UTC
Re^28: aXML vs TT2 by Logicus (Initiate) on Oct 24, 2011 at 05:49 UTC
Re^25: aXML vs TT2 by keszler (Priest) on Oct 23, 2011 at 20:10 UTC
So aXML is Self Modifying Code?	[reply]
Re^26: aXML vs TT2 by Logicus (Initiate) on Oct 24, 2011 at 00:19 UTC
Yes, sort of, in a very precise controlled manner the input aXML document transforms into the output in accordance with the given set of plugins operating under the rules of tag precedence.	[reply]
Re^26: aXML vs TT2 by Anonymous Monk on Oct 24, 2011 at 01:43 UTC
According to that page, self-modifying-code refers to modifying cpu instruction (asm), not MetaCircularEvaluator (eval), or in this case, s//eval/ge	[reply]