This node falls below the community's minimum standard of quality and will not be displayed.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Ideal solutions in software
by Corion (Patriarch) on Oct 24, 2011 at 07:13 UTC

    Bullshit - Einstein was no "outsider", he had a profound academic career in physics.

    Again you suggest your findings are new and revolutionary, and you willfully ignore all the examples of prior art that you have been given before.

    Please take your aXML discussion off this site. This site is for discussing Perl, not discussing your language. You are welcome to discuss problems involving your implementation of aXML, as far as they concern Perl.

Re: Ideal solutions in software
by moritz (Cardinal) on Oct 24, 2011 at 07:30 UTC

    Just because some contributions from the outside have advanced some field doesn't mean that all (or even the majority) of contributions from the outside advance a field.

    For example there have been a plethora of laymen "proofs" for Fermat's Last Theorem, and most of them had relatively simple flaws (for example dividing by zero).

    We've seen your proposals, and asked questions that you did not answer properly, and have pointed out flaws. So for me your proposals are in the "rejected until proven useful" category. So stop advocating, and do something useful with it.

Re: Ideal solutions in software
by anneli (Pilgrim) on Oct 24, 2011 at 07:23 UTC
    megalomania (plural megalomanias)
    1. A psychopathological condition characterized by delusional fantasies of wealth, power, or omnipotence.

    Sorry, but what you're doing is nothing new. The difference is, most people have moved on thence.

    (by the way, calling Perl 6 a "complete rethink" is pretty misguided.)