Re^2: Can you explain the result?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Can you explain the result? by choroba (Cardinal) on Dec 06, 2011 at 13:33 UTC
It does. Try with print instead of return to see.	[reply]
Re^4: Can you explain the result? by Anonymous Monk on Dec 06, 2011 at 13:36 UTC
Do you mean the priority of `and` is even lower than `return`???	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: Can you explain the result? by Utilitarian (Vicar) on Dec 06, 2011 at 14:17 UTC
Indeed it is, if you want something evaluated put it in parenthesis to be sure `return (1 and 0);` [download] returns 0 as you would expect. `print "Good ",qw(night morning afternoon evening)[(localtime)[2]/6]," fellow monks."`	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: Can you explain the result? by MidLifeXis (Monsignor) on Dec 06, 2011 at 18:01 UTC
See perlop for the precedence table. `not`, `and`, `or`, and `xor` are all at the bottom of the table. --MidLifeXis	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: Can you explain the result? by Anonymous Monk on Dec 06, 2011 at 15:09 UTC
Indeed. `and` 'n `or` are good for control flow such as replacing simple error-handling `if`s, while `&&` 'n `\|\|` are your standard Boolean logic operators.	[reply] [d/l] [select]