Re: Regex solution needed

It pains me to see that our beloved Perl is abused for censorship (and then even censorship of the most silly and hypocritical kind). Fortunately, regex solutions for this kind of "problem" never work and after a lot of time and effort spent, the whole idea is scrapped (as it should have been from the very beginning).

CountZero

"If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law

Comment on Re: Regex solution needed

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Regex solution needed by moklevat (Priest) on Feb 26, 2007 at 15:41 UTC
Dear CountZero, Your post 601925 has been flagged by PerlMonks's UnProfaneMe v2.1 system as containing profanity. Please review the change(s) suggested by UnProfaneMe v2.1 and make appropriate corrections to your text. We thank you for doing your part to keep Teh Internets safe for children who are bright enough to read, but not smart enough to understand context. Original: "...after a lot of time and effort spent, the whole idea is scrapped (as it should have been from the very beginning). Better: "...after a lot of time and effort spent, the whole idea is sdungped (as it should have been from the very beginning). Sincerely, The UnProfaneMe Team (v2.1)	[reply]
Re^2: Regex solution needed by zebedee (Pilgrim) on Feb 25, 2007 at 07:53 UTC
Hear, hear! Like the time AOL refused to let people use the location "Scunthorpe" because it failed to get past their filters. AOL and Scunthorpe	[reply]