Re: Schwartzian Transfrom using a subroutine

I am getting the original sorting of the list.

Because your sub doesn't return the transformed string; it returns the result of the the last transform. Change that to:

sub transform{
    my $string = shift;
    $string =~ tr/A-Z/a-z/;#kleinschreibung
    $string =~ tr/a-z//cd;
    $string; 
}
[download]

(As an aside; are you aware that for my $word (@output){say $word;} is more easily written as say for @output?)

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re: Schwartzian Transfrom using a subroutine Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Schwartzian Transfrom using a subroutine by oliverhuber (Initiate) on Jan 09, 2013 at 12:13 UTC
Many thanks! It's working now. Thanks also for the sidenote!	[reply]
Re^2: Schwartzian Transfrom using a subroutine by jwkrahn (Abbot) on Jan 09, 2013 at 13:33 UTC
(As an aside; are you aware that `for my $word (@output){say $word;}` is more easily written as `say for @output`?) They are not the same: `$ perl -E'my @x = qw/one two three/; for my $x ( @x ) { say $x }' one two three $ perl -E'my @x = qw/one two three/; say @x' onetwothree` [download]	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: Schwartzian Transfrom using a subroutine by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 09, 2013 at 13:45 UTC
perl -E'my @x = qw/one two three/; say @x' You missed something... `is more easily written as say for @output?) #.............................^^^` [download] With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply] [d/l]