in reply to Re: Schwartzian Transfrom using a subroutine
in thread Schwartzian Transfrom using a subroutine

(As an aside; are you aware that for my $word (@output){say $word;} is more easily written as say for @output?)

They are not the same:

$ perl -E'my @x = qw/one two three/; for my $x ( @x ) { say $x }' one two three $ perl -E'my @x = qw/one two three/; say @x' onetwothree

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Schwartzian Transfrom using a subroutine
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 09, 2013 at 13:45 UTC
    perl -E'my @x = qw/one two three/; say @x'

    You missed something...

    is more easily written as say for @output?) #.............................^^^

    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.