in reply to Re: Schwartzian Transfrom using a subroutine
in thread Schwartzian Transfrom using a subroutine
(As an aside; are you aware that for my $word (@output){say $word;} is more easily written as say for @output?)
They are not the same:
$ perl -E'my @x = qw/one two three/; for my $x ( @x ) { say $x }' one two three $ perl -E'my @x = qw/one two three/; say @x' onetwothree
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: Schwartzian Transfrom using a subroutine
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 09, 2013 at 13:45 UTC |