Re: Moose stringification overloading isn't working

My head hurts, and the wall seems to still be fine. Any ideas?

Comment on Re: Moose stringification overloading isn't working

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Moose stringification overloading isn't working by dd-b (Pilgrim) on Feb 10, 2013 at 02:34 UTC
Drat. Does that mean the concept and execution seems sound and you need more detail, or just that you didn't look at it because it wasn't a self-contained bagged sample? As I said, the small sample I built worked, so I'd have to chase it up the tree. Which I will if necessary, if there's nothing obviously wrong with the approach.	[reply]
Re^3: Moose stringification overloading isn't working by Anonymous Monk on Feb 10, 2013 at 07:54 UTC
It means code is clearer than words :) and your question is unclear (to me) If I had the same question, first thing I would do is try to replicate it in a short self contained example, and then I'd either have a test case, or I'd figure out where I'm confused, or have some code to show what I'm trying to accomplish Code can be much clearer than English	[reply]