Re^2: Moose stringification overloading isn't working

in reply to Re: Moose stringification overloading isn't working
in thread Moose stringification overloading isn't working

Drat. Does that mean the concept and execution seems sound and you need more detail, or just that you didn't look at it because it wasn't a self-contained bagged sample?

As I said, the small sample I built worked, so I'd have to chase it up the tree. Which I will if necessary, if there's nothing obviously wrong with the approach.

Comment on Re^2: Moose stringification overloading isn't working

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Moose stringification overloading isn't working by Anonymous Monk on Feb 10, 2013 at 07:54 UTC
It means code is clearer than words :) and your question is unclear (to me) If I had the same question, first thing I would do is try to replicate it in a short self contained example, and then I'd either have a test case, or I'd figure out where I'm confused, or have some code to show what I'm trying to accomplish Code can be much clearer than English	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom