Re^2: Some issues with WWW::Mechanize::Firefox->xpath() method (xpath 1.0)

in reply to Re: Some issues with WWW::Mechanize::Firefox->xpath() method (xpath 1.0)
in thread Some issues with WWW::Mechanize::Firefox->xpath() method

That is not valid xpath syntax, what documentation are you reading?

All comes from the specs (http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath/#section-Expressions) which I need to respect.

____
HTH, Dominique
My two favorites:
If the only tool you have is a hammer, you will see every problem as a nail. --Abraham Maslow
Bien faire, et le faire savoir...

Comment on Re^2: Some issues with WWW::Mechanize::Firefox->xpath() method (xpath 1.0)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Some issues with WWW::Mechanize::Firefox->xpath() method (xpath 1.0) by Anonymous Monk on Apr 02, 2013 at 11:00 UTC
All comes from the specs Hmm, I looked at http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath/#function-substring which only shows a literal .... But it doesn't match in LibXML, OTOH, LibXML accepts the xpath a valid Go figure :/	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom