Re^3: Sorry I wanted to delete it

That wasn't the point. From the linked page:

Why shouldn't I delete a node or its content?

PerlMonks is a place to learn. As often happens in real life, Perl Monks learn (and often learn best) from mistakes that they and others have made. If you make a mistake in a node and then delete it, you may be saving your pride but you are also depriving your fellow Monks of the chance to learn from the mistake. Only actual duplicates, spam, and obvious trolling should be deleted.

Comment on Re^3: Sorry I wanted to delete it

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Sorry I wanted to delete it (delete node without replies) by Anonymous Monk on Jul 28, 2014 at 21:04 UTC
That wasn't the point...Why shouldn't I delete a node or its content?... Should is not must So the OP decided (for whatever reason decide), I don't need this question asked or answered, the node has no replies, but is considered restore -- in the past such nodes were reaped honoring the OPs wishes because there were no replies	[reply]
Re^5: Sorry I wanted to delete it (board rules) by LanX (Saint) on Jul 28, 2014 at 21:31 UTC
> So the OP decided ... Visitors don't decide about house rules. Cheers Rolf (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)	[reply]
Re^6: Sorry I wanted to delete it (board rules deleting nodes without replies editing nodes) by Anonymous Monk on Jul 28, 2014 at 21:42 UTC
`>> So the OP decided ... >Visitors don't decide about house rules.` [download] Then how do you explain the OP being able to delete node contents and node title? The house rules allow it	[reply] [d/l]
Re^7: Sorry I wanted to delete it (board rules deleting nodes without replies editing nodes) by Anonymous Monk on Jul 28, 2014 at 21:49 UTC
Re^8: Sorry I wanted to delete it (board rules deleting nodes without replies editing nodes) by Anonymous Monk on Jul 28, 2014 at 22:55 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here