Re^4: Sorry I wanted to delete it (delete node without replies)

That wasn't the point...Why shouldn't I delete a node or its content?...

Should is not must

So the OP decided (for whatever reason decide), I don't need this question asked or answered, the node has no replies, but is considered restore -- in the past such nodes were reaped honoring the OPs wishes because there were no replies

Comment on Re^4: Sorry I wanted to delete it (delete node without replies)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Sorry I wanted to delete it (board rules) by LanX (Saint) on Jul 28, 2014 at 21:31 UTC
> So the OP decided ... Visitors don't decide about house rules. Cheers Rolf (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)	[reply]
Re^6: Sorry I wanted to delete it (board rules deleting nodes without replies editing nodes) by Anonymous Monk on Jul 28, 2014 at 21:42 UTC
`>> So the OP decided ... >Visitors don't decide about house rules.` [download] Then how do you explain the OP being able to delete node contents and node title? The house rules allow it	[reply] [d/l]
Re^7: Sorry I wanted to delete it (board rules deleting nodes without replies editing nodes) by Anonymous Monk on Jul 28, 2014 at 21:49 UTC
"being able to delete" - you mean edit. And using the edit feature to delete contents is frowned upon too. Sometimes the mods will even manually restore content deleted in this way. Example	[reply]
Re^8: Sorry I wanted to delete it (board rules deleting nodes without replies editing nodes) by Anonymous Monk on Jul 28, 2014 at 22:55 UTC
Re^9: Sorry I wanted to delete it (board rules deleting nodes without replies editing nodes) by Anonymous Monk on Jul 28, 2014 at 23:43 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here