Re^9: Accessing Array of Arrays

Well, considering how "specific" was the "question", the answer was about as specific as it could have been. Apparently the description of the split() built-in is not the only doc GuiPerl needs to read. The whole of perldata for example. Seems to me he's mostly stabbing in the dark not really knowing what he's doing.

BTW, we are all supposed to be programmers in here. If you want a wishy washy feel good yada yada you're probably not at the right place.

Jenda
Enoch was right!
Enjoy the last years of Rome.

Comment on Re^9: Accessing Array of Arrays

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^10: Accessing Array of Arrays by Anonymous Monk on Oct 06, 2014 at 11:35 UTC
If you want a wishy washy feel good yada yada you're probably not at the right place. No, I don't need "feel good" posts everywhere, and my own posting style is probably just as often like the "civil" example above as the "positive" one (and hopefully only very rarely the "rude" one, in which case I don't mind those nodes being downvoted). But consider the opposite of what you're saying - I assume you don't want the Monastery to be a place where rudeness and posts like the one in question are the norm. Anyway, that's not the point I was trying to make. I usually value content more than tone, it's just that the node in question is lacking in both, so I was hoping to change the minds the monks who upvoted it a bit. Who knows how successful I was :-)	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^10: Accessing Array of Arrays
by Anonymous Monk on Oct 06, 2014 at 11:35 UTC

If you want a wishy washy feel good yada yada you're probably not at the right place.

No, I don't need "feel good" posts everywhere, and my own posting style is probably just as often like the "civil" example above as the "positive" one (and hopefully only very rarely the "rude" one, in which case I don't mind those nodes being downvoted). But consider the opposite of what you're saying - I assume you don't want the Monastery to be a place where rudeness and posts like the one in question are the norm.

Anyway, that's not the point I was trying to make. I usually value content more than tone, it's just that the node in question is lacking in both, so I was hoping to change the minds the monks who upvoted it a bit. Who knows how successful I was :-)

[reply]