in reply to Re: Re: Re: Camel vs Llama for a newbie
in thread Camel vs Llama for a newbie

Did you read the same Object Oriented Perl that I did? It covers vast areas that aren't even mentioned in the Camel.

--
<http://www.dave.org.uk>

Perl Training in the UK <http://www.iterative-software.com>

  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Camel vs Llama for a newbie

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Camel vs Llama for a newbie
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Sep 07, 2001 at 20:41 UTC
    I read it all the way through ... twice. The reason for twice was that I was sure I missed something the first time through. But, I hadn't.

    It's been a few months since I read it, but I remember reading it and thinking "Ummm ... Duh!" to pretty much every concept Conway put forth. If you want, I can go through the TOC and say why I felt that his treatment of the topic wasn't as good as Camel + PM ...

    ------
    We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.

    Don't go borrowing trouble. For programmers, this means Worry only about what you need to implement.

[reply]
      Of course, *several* people on PM did glean quite a bit from Object Oriented Perl, so it's not really a fair assessment. :)
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom