Re^9: Non-fatal error handling with Mouse types?

You can always code the way you want. Maybe I should have said, “unusual practice that introduces an unfamiliar and fragile error handling pattern,” instead of worst. Perl may be the most ropeful language there is. :P My feedback is 100% intended to help you down the road; and improve the Perlsphere with best practices so it’s taken seriously. I used to bristle at or flat out reject exactly the kind of advice I’m giving so I understand. I feel the bikeshedding implication is unfair; I’m not injecting a personal preference for magenta here and I’m extremely open about my own personal preferences / idiosyncrasies and where they clash with reality.

Comment on Re^9: Non-fatal error handling with Mouse types?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^10: Non-fatal error handling with Mouse types? by wanna_code_perl (Friar) on Oct 02, 2019 at 17:01 UTC
I'm sorry. I did not mean to imply that you were bikeshedding. The point I did not make very well was simply that I've been in many a lively discussion on error handling, and bikeshedding happens somewhat often. Nor did I mean to bristle at any of your feedback. More that you're preaching to the converted, and if anything, I'm tired of maintaining this module, but it's apparently too proprietary to publish on CPAN, and I'm apparently the only one left who is any good at Perl. But I digress. :-)	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^10: Non-fatal error handling with Mouse types?
by wanna_code_perl (Friar) on Oct 02, 2019 at 17:01 UTC

I'm sorry. I did not mean to imply that you were bikeshedding. The point I did not make very well was simply that I've been in many a lively discussion on error handling, and bikeshedding happens somewhat often.

Nor did I mean to bristle at any of your feedback. More that you're preaching to the converted, and if anything, I'm tired of maintaining this module, but it's apparently too proprietary to publish on CPAN, and I'm apparently the only one left who is any good at Perl. But I digress. :-)

[reply]