Re^5: Inclusion of Raku on PerlMonks

Sigh. I've been following the Rakudists' debate for months. I'm not sure what your agenda is either in flogging the dead horse of "Raku is Perl" or in repeating old, irrelevant and untrue accusations about me (with links!) That post has 30 upvotes fyi. And your command of English is quite excellent enough to see that I made no mention there of hatred, simply asked the Rakudists to stand on their own two feet.

Which they are now doing.

You are trying to paint me with a broad and inaccurate brush. Why?

Are you sure your advocacy of Raku isn't misplaced and outside of what the Rakudists themselves are seeking?

Update: also just fyi I'm not interested in verbal jousting or circular wordplay masquerading as sophomoric "debate":

why would we think that even they would welcome such a mention here?

See the text I quoted.

I don't think you can interpret that small quote as seeking inclusion.

I never claimed that, it was a counterpoint to your post.

As I said, sigh ...

The way forward always starts with a minimal test.

Comment on Re^5: Inclusion of Raku on PerlMonks

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Inclusion of Raku on PerlMonks by haukex (Archbishop) on Oct 15, 2019 at 10:25 UTC
You are trying to paint me with a broad and inaccurate brush. I explained myself at length here, you never responded. I'm not sure how else you expect me to interpret your various writings on Perl 6. To me, you appear to have a giant chip on your shoulder. I'm not sure what your agenda is either in flogging the dead horse of "Raku is Perl" When did I say that? I cited my sources, you didn't, so I'm just pointing out your apparent bias that seems to me to be affecting your interpretations, be it your interpretations of what the Perl 6 devs said, Monastery policy, or what I wrote. Sorry to be so direct, but I'm tired of your rhetoric, and I'm not going to waste my time on your strawmen, so I'm out.	[reply]
Re^7: Inclusion of Raku on PerlMonks by LanX (Saint) on Oct 15, 2019 at 11:04 UTC
Sorry, but I have to agree with him: > > your command of English is quite excellent. And no matter what your agenda is in repeating old, irrelevant and untrue accusations about me, painting me with a broad and inaccurate brush... Your English is really not bad. Be warned that I will counter any moderate attempt to criticize me now with a flood of harsh unfounded attacks. So don't even try to deny it... Your English okie! Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice} Update Belated sarcasm warning.	[reply]