You are trying to paint me with a broad and inaccurate brush.

I explained myself at length here, you never responded. I'm not sure how else you expect me to interpret your various writings on Perl 6. To me, you appear to have a giant chip on your shoulder.

I'm not sure what your agenda is either in flogging the dead horse of "Raku is Perl"

When did I say that? I cited my sources, you didn't, so I'm just pointing out your apparent bias that seems to me to be affecting your interpretations, be it your interpretations of what the Perl 6 devs said, Monastery policy, or what I wrote. Sorry to be so direct, but I'm tired of your rhetoric, and I'm not going to waste my time on your strawmen, so I'm out.