in reply to Re: RFC: "assignary" operator ?= : ( conditional assignment , golf, death by diabetes )
in thread RFC: "assignary" operator ?= :

thanks :)

you forgot mention "assholy trinity" as possible name for such operator, it would be very on-topic in this community :)

  • Comment on Re^2: RFC: "assignary" operator ?= : ( conditional assignment , golf, death by diabetes )

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: RFC: "assignary" operator ?= : ( conditional assignment , golf, death by diabetes )
by LanX (Saint) on Dec 09, 2019 at 19:36 UTC
    > "assholy trinity" ... it would be very on-topic in this community :)

    You start a "request for comments" and then you call us assholes?

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
    Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice

[reply]

      It was not meant this way, Rolf. I would not dare to call anybody here "asshole" or other disrespectful way.

      It was just other trying-to-be-funny name for this operator in this series of suggestions:

      • assignary
      • ter-signment
      • tri-sign
      • con-sign
      • assholy trinity :)

      And "on-topic in this community" was not meant as calling assholes, but as holy trinity fits in cleric terminology used here at Perl Monks. (Being also member here, if I would call community disrespectful way, I would call myself this way too.)

      Just wordplay joke aimed to operator itself, no offense.

[reply]

In Section Meditations