Re^3: RFC: "assignary" operator ?= : ( conditional assignment , golf, death by diabetes )

> "assholy trinity" ... it would be very on-topic in this community :)

You start a "request for comments" and then you call us assholes?

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

Wikisyntax for the Monastery
FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}

Comment on Re^3: RFC: "assignary" operator ?= : ( conditional assignment , golf, death by diabetes )

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: RFC: "assignary" operator ?= : ( conditional assignment , golf, death by diabetes ) by richard.sharpe (Sexton) on Dec 09, 2019 at 21:24 UTC
It was not meant this way, Rolf. I would not dare to call anybody here "asshole" or other disrespectful way. It was just other trying-to-be-funny name for this operator in this series of suggestions: assignary ter-signment tri-sign con-sign assholy trinity :) And "on-topic in this community" was not meant as calling assholes, but as holy trinity fits in cleric terminology used here at Perl Monks. (Being also member here, if I would call community disrespectful way, I would call myself this way too.) Just wordplay joke aimed to operator itself, no offense.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^4: RFC: "assignary" operator ?= : ( conditional assignment , golf, death by diabetes )
by richard.sharpe (Sexton) on Dec 09, 2019 at 21:24 UTC

It was not meant this way, Rolf. I would not dare to call anybody here "asshole" or other disrespectful way.

It was just other trying-to-be-funny name for this operator in this series of suggestions:

assignary
ter-signment
tri-sign
con-sign
assholy trinity :)

And "on-topic in this community" was not meant as calling assholes, but as holy trinity fits in cleric terminology used here at Perl Monks. (Being also member here, if I would call community disrespectful way, I would call myself this way too.)

Just wordplay joke aimed to operator itself, no offense.

[reply]