in reply to Re^5: Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications
in thread Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications
- you listed two packages twice.
Yepp, editing error. Copied from another browser window listing source and binary packages, both with the same name. Accidentally did not remove the duplicates.
- again libprotocol-acme-perl is not in the Acme:: namespace or related
But still it is a Debian perl package containing acme in its name. That's what I searched for. I never claimed those results were in the Acme:: name space.
Alexander
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^7: Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications
by LanX (Saint) on Jan 09, 2021 at 23:32 UTC | |
by Smonff (Monk) on Jan 10, 2021 at 12:21 UTC |