Re^5: Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications

in reply to Re^4: Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications
in thread Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications

some remarks

you listed two packages twice.
again libprotocol-acme-perl is not in the Acme:: namespace or related
Having a debian package doesn't mean it's meant for production, I have plenty of fun projects not meant for production.
Only one of those distributions Acme::Damn had a notable list of reverse dependencies on CPAN outside Acme::
All of them had kind of "ironic" documentation, hinting to a certain "doubt" of the author

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

Wikisyntax for the Monastery}

Comment on Re^5: Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications by afoken (Chancellor) on Jan 09, 2021 at 22:26 UTC
you listed two packages twice. Yepp, editing error. Copied from another browser window listing source and binary packages, both with the same name. Accidentally did not remove the duplicates. again libprotocol-acme-perl is not in the Acme:: namespace or related But still it is a Debian perl package containing acme in its name. That's what I searched for. I never claimed those results were in the Acme:: name space. Alexander -- Today I will gladly share my knowledge and experience, for there are no sweeter words than "I told you so". ;-)	[reply]
Re^7: Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications by LanX (Saint) on Jan 09, 2021 at 23:32 UTC
I was also replying to the OP, and I already said that Protocol::ACME is something completely different. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply]
Re^8: Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications by Smonff (Monk) on Jan 10, 2021 at 12:21 UTC
Oh, this is the protocol used by Let's Encrypt! 🌸	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom