in reply to Re^3: Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications
in thread Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications

A quick search on packages.debian.org for source packages in Debian stable (buster) containing acme finds these (and some non-perl stuff):

Yes, the debian package names are silly, but at least they are consistent:

s/^lib//;
s/-perl$//;
s/-/::/g;

[download]

... and you get the lower-cased CPAN distribution name.

Alexander

--
Today I will gladly share my knowledge and experience, for there are no sweeter words than "I told you so". ;-)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications
by LanX (Saint) on Jan 09, 2021 at 21:15 UTC
    some remarks

    • you listed two packages twice.
    • again libprotocol-acme-perl is not in the Acme:: namespace or related
    • Having a debian package doesn't mean it's meant for production, I have plenty of fun projects not meant for production.
    • Only one of those distributions Acme::Damn had a notable list of reverse dependencies on CPAN outside Acme::
    • All of them had kind of "ironic" documentation, hinting to a certain "doubt" of the author

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
    Wikisyntax for the Monastery

[reply]
      • you listed two packages twice.

      Yepp, editing error. Copied from another browser window listing source and binary packages, both with the same name. Accidentally did not remove the duplicates.

      • again libprotocol-acme-perl is not in the Acme:: namespace or related

      But still it is a Debian perl package containing acme in its name. That's what I searched for. I never claimed those results were in the Acme:: name space.

      Alexander

      --
      Today I will gladly share my knowledge and experience, for there are no sweeter words than "I told you so". ;-)
[reply]
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom