Re^3: Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications by afoken (Chancellor) on Jan 09, 2021 at 20:02 UTC
A quick search on packages.debian.org for source packages in Debian stable (buster) containing acme finds these (and some non-perl stuff): libacme-bleach-perl libacme-brainfck-perl libacme-constant-perl libacme-constant-perl libacme-damn-perl libacme-eyedrops-perl libacme-poe-knee-perl libacme-poe-knee-perl libprotocol-acme-perl Yes, the debian package names are silly, but at least they are consistent: `s/^lib//; s/-perl$//; s/-/::/g;` [download] ... and you get the lower-cased CPAN distribution name. Alexander -- Today I will gladly share my knowledge and experience, for there are no sweeter words than "I told you so". ;-)	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications by LanX (Saint) on Jan 09, 2021 at 21:15 UTC
some remarks you listed two packages twice. again libprotocol-acme-perl is not in the Acme:: namespace or related Having a debian package doesn't mean it's meant for production, I have plenty of fun projects not meant for production. Only one of those distributions Acme::Damn had a notable list of reverse dependencies on CPAN outside Acme:: All of them had kind of "ironic" documentation, hinting to a certain "doubt" of the author Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply]
Re^6: Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications by afoken (Chancellor) on Jan 09, 2021 at 22:26 UTC
you listed two packages twice. Yepp, editing error. Copied from another browser window listing source and binary packages, both with the same name. Accidentally did not remove the duplicates. again libprotocol-acme-perl is not in the Acme:: namespace or related But still it is a Debian perl package containing acme in its name. That's what I searched for. I never claimed those results were in the Acme:: name space. Alexander -- Today I will gladly share my knowledge and experience, for there are no sweeter words than "I told you so". ;-)	[reply]
Re^7: Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications by LanX (Saint) on Jan 09, 2021 at 23:32 UTC
Re^8: Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications by Smonff (Monk) on Jan 10, 2021 at 12:21 UTC
Re^4: Ressources for Acme namespace cultural implications by Smonff (Monk) on Jan 10, 2021 at 12:54 UTC
I should define production maybe a bit better. I am considering some potential artistic use of programming. Imagine an artist write a program that the result is displayed (almost for sure on a computer) in a museum or any other artistic space. Then, eventually those modules could be helpful. And the fact that they would be available in the Debian packages would make them easier to deploy in the museum production or even help the curator keeping them alive (Perl is quoted in this page) for a very long time, if they are considered as of any interest. I am currently doing those researches (in an informal way), but examples of what I search for could be: https://monoskop.org/Slub https://monoskop.org/Georgi_Penkov https://www.perl.com/pub/2004/08/31/livecode.html/ Even the fact that the YAPC::EU Conference Party happened at the Cluj Art Museum (24 August 2016) is of interest Perl haikus Perl one-liners It's getting a bit too far... 🌸	[reply]