in reply to Re^2: Papal infallibility
in thread Papal infallibility
Thankyou for the ++. I did mean my response because I spent very little time or thought on it.
I didn't answer the "there are a lot of things monks are supposed to be, but lazy is not one of them!"" question because I don't know who wrote that and why and I am too lazy to find out .... but if the person who wrote that quote is listening, please don't be lazy and tell us why you wrote it and what you meant and I promise to (non-lazily) update my The First Ten Perl Monks node on the history of Perl monks with your answer.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: Papal infallibility
by Discipulus (Canon) on Jan 23, 2021 at 12:56 UTC | |
by eyepopslikeamosquito (Archbishop) on Jan 23, 2021 at 14:02 UTC | |
by talexb (Chancellor) on Jan 23, 2021 at 15:21 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Jan 23, 2021 at 15:40 UTC |