Re: Should I use v5.10 because of named groups?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Should I use v5.10 because of named groups? by hrcerq (Monk) on Apr 15, 2021 at 19:28 UTC
At first I didn't understand what you meant by linking to this other thread. But now I've joined pieces together: It appeared right after this one; The data pattern is pretty close to the one I describe here; It was created by some anonymous monk. I'm not saying you're implying anything (as you might just be pointing something related that might help, in fact I believe that's the case), but anyway I'd like to mention I'm not that anonymous monk, as I'm aware it could be understood as duplicating threads somehow, which is not cool.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^2: Should I use v5.10 because of named groups?
by hrcerq (Monk) on Apr 15, 2021 at 19:28 UTC

At first I didn't understand what you meant by linking to this other thread. But now I've joined pieces together:

It appeared right after this one;
The data pattern is pretty close to the one I describe here;
It was created by some anonymous monk.

I'm not saying you're implying anything (as you might just be pointing something related that might help, in fact I believe that's the case), but anyway I'd like to mention I'm not that anonymous monk, as I'm aware it could be understood as duplicating threads somehow, which is not cool.

[reply]