in reply to Re: Terminology: Is DBIx::Class an ORM?
in thread Terminology: Is DBIx::Class an ORM?
Many thanks, that explains a lot. :)
I'd rather call this an SQL abstraction.
It's much like SQL::Abstract and allows to cover (almost?) all semantics of SQL queries.
But yeah, like I said I'm strongly associating ORM to "Active Records" and the resulting limitations.
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: Terminology: Is DBIx::Class an ORM?
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 04, 2021 at 12:39 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Jun 04, 2021 at 13:02 UTC |