in reply to Re^5: Readonly vs ReadonlyX (updated PC-Source + Const::Fast)
in thread Readonly vs ReadonlyX

Why do you think there's something wrong with Const::Fast? (There is a caveat listed in the docs, though.)

  • Comment on Re^6: Readonly vs ReadonlyX (updated PC-Source + Const::Fast)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Readonly vs ReadonlyX (updated PC-Source + Const::Fast)
by LanX (Saint) on Mar 13, 2023 at 16:49 UTC
    > Why do you think there's something wrong with Const::Fast? (There is a caveat listed in the docs, though.)

    I don't, it's a rhetorical question.

    Meaning "why don't you use Const::Fast instead of ReadonlyX?".

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the 𐍀𐌴𐍂𐌻 Programming Language :)
    Wikisyntax for the Monastery

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom