in reply to Re^6: Readonly vs ReadonlyX (updated PC-Source + Const::Fast)
in thread Readonly vs ReadonlyX

> Why do you think there's something wrong with Const::Fast? (There is a caveat listed in the docs, though.)

I don't, it's a rhetorical question.

Meaning "why don't you use Const::Fast instead of ReadonlyX?".

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the 𐍀𐌴𐍂𐌻 Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery

  • Comment on Re^7: Readonly vs ReadonlyX (updated PC-Source + Const::Fast)

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom