Those parens tossed me a curve ball (nicely done) at first, but I've
de-obfued it to:
s//=japh # umm :/;
tr/=""; # umm ://d;
print;
-Blake
| [reply] [d/l] |
Yeah, it's trivial. I just liked the way it looked. I don't like how I had to write the second comment, though.
| [reply] |
As long as you're just removing the chars anyway, the order doesn't matter for the first part of the tr///. If you don't like the second smilley, you
could write it as:
(y)="";
#:mu ))d);
Really you have a lot of freedom with that last line...
-Blake
| [reply] [d/l] |