Re^3: Wanting some clarification / opinions on MCE vs Threads

(I should say my threads equivalent)

Hm. No offence but, Ew! :)

Remember that MCE is a wrapper (actually a suite of wrappers, or is that sweet wrapper:) over the top of threads(and other things), providing syntactic sugar for simple operations.

You can easily do the same yourself. Say write TGrep.pm:

Then write:

#! perl -slw
use strict;
use TGrep;
use Time::HiRes qw[ time ];

our $N //= 1e3;

my $start = time;
my @a = tgrep{ $_ % 5 == 0 } [ 1..$N ];
printf "Took %.9f seconds\n", time() -$start;
print scalar @a;

__END__
C:\test>t-tgrep -N=1e5
Took 3.830074787 seconds
20000
[download]

Of course, you'd probably be better sticking to grep for such simple things:

$t=time; 
my @a = grep{ $_%5 == 0 } 1 .. 1e6; 
print time-$t;;
0.18144702911377
[download]

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked

? @{ $_ } : $_ } @_ ); $Qin-

Comment on Re^3: Wanting some clarification / opinions on MCE vs Threads Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Wanting some clarification / opinions on MCE vs Threads by jmmitc06 (Beadle) on Feb 05, 2015 at 14:50 UTC
Yeah, I would never use threads for something this simple, I was just demonstrating what I perceived to be a readability improvement between threads and MCE with that example since it was quick to work up. Since it is just a wrapper for threads, does it make sense to use it in when possible? Is there any reason not to use it IF I am in a situation where I can install modules? (which I should be since 99% of the time I'm running code on my lab machines). I'm starting to think that there isn't a downside except that MCE is not part of a standard Perl install but there aren't many code examples of MCE in the wild so it's hard to tell.	[reply]
Re^5: Wanting some clarification / opinions on MCE vs Threads by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Feb 05, 2015 at 16:47 UTC
Since it is just a wrapper for threads, It seems to do more than just wrap threads. Indeed, it appears to spawn processes by default and only uses threads if you ask for them. does it make sense to use it in when possible? If you're (more) comfortable using this kind of (IMO over-engineered) framework, then take a look at the bug history (short & up to date) and maintenance history (3 new versions in 3 months) and then try it for your application. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked	[reply]
Re^6: Wanting some clarification / opinions on MCE vs Threads by ikegami (Patriarch) on Feb 05, 2015 at 19:26 UTC
Ignore this one too X_X	[reply]
Re^7: Wanting some clarification / opinions on MCE vs Threads by Anonymous Monk on Feb 05, 2015 at 22:13 UTC
Re^5: Wanting some clarification / opinions on MCE vs Threads by ikegami (Patriarch) on Feb 05, 2015 at 15:56 UTC
nm, I understand now	[reply]
Re^4: Wanting some clarification / opinions on MCE vs Threads by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Feb 07, 2015 at 13:40 UTC
`use Threads::Queue;` I just wondered why i failed to install Threads::Queue ;-) Perhaps i should have better read the code: `my( $Qin, $Qout ) = map Thread::Queue->new, 1..2;`? My best regards, Karl ŤThe Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostropheť	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: Wanting some clarification / opinions on MCE vs Threads by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Feb 07, 2015 at 13:44 UTC
I just wondered why i failed to install Threads::Queue ;-) Whoops! Sorry about that. (Now corrected; thanks.) With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked	[reply]