in reply to Re^3: New Feature: Thread Watcher - Should we call it 'follow' instead?
in thread New Feature: Thread Watcher
The page to check is called My *Watched* Nodes so newbies need to associate "watch" with "follow".
On another note:
It's also confusing me that
[ ] root says jdporter posted Re^3: New Feature: Thread Watcher - Shou +ld we call it 'follow' instead? > New Feature: Thread Watcher [ ] root says You've got a reply to Re: Why is Dumper returning "!!1" +for true file test? from XXX at Re^2: Why is Dumper returning "!!1" f +or true file test?
Other features I'd like is an option to shorten the messages from redundancy
That is applying a regex to shorten the context node
[ ] root says You've got a reply to "Re: ..." from XXX at Re^2: Why is + Dumper returning "!!1" for true file test?
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
see Wikisyntax for the Monastery
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^5: New Feature: Thread Watcher - Should we call it 'follow' instead?
by jdporter (Paladin) on Apr 07, 2024 at 21:13 UTC | |
|
Re^5: New Feature: Thread Watcher - Should we call it 'follow' instead?
by jdporter (Paladin) on Apr 08, 2024 at 12:42 UTC | |
|
Re^5: New Feature: Thread Watcher - Should we call it 'follow' instead?
by jdporter (Paladin) on Apr 08, 2024 at 12:48 UTC | |
|
Re^5: New Feature: Thread Watcher - Should we call it 'follow' instead?
by Danny (Chaplain) on Apr 08, 2024 at 21:03 UTC |