in reply to Re^4: New Feature: Thread Watcher - Should we call it 'follow' instead?
in thread New Feature: Thread Watcher
It's also confusing me that
- watches list the actual node prior to context
- reply notifications list context prior to actual node
The problem is that the watcher code now — thanks to an earlier request to roll up multiple notifications — has to produce messages like the following:
I abbreviated "somewhere under" as ">".
Can you suggest new wording for all of those so that they (a) convey the meaning intended by watcher and (b) have the desired consistency?
|
|---|