in reply to Ideas for "fixing" PerlMonks 1.0

> I never got going with the "add markdown as an option", and that is largely due to there not being a dev environment possible.

Downloading Everything 1 (or 2) should be good enough to implement a proof of concept

https://web.archive.org/web/20080101113504/http://everydevel.com/index.pl?node=Everything%20Core

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
see Wikisyntax for the Monastery

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Ideas for "fixing" PerlMonks 1.0
by jdporter (Paladin) on Dec 16, 2024 at 19:25 UTC

    Sure, one could do that. But is it really worth the effort? I think not. I maintain that all effort would be better expended on trying to create a replacement system entirely from scratch. (well, not entirely. it should be built with modern, open-source software.)

      > But is it really worth the effort?

      I think so, yes!

      And I wouldn't try to implement a "modern" perl backend but start with an attractive JS frontend.

      Most importantly I would be capable to do a POC without messing around with the local patch system.

      YMMV. (Certainly)

      Cheers Rolf
      (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
      see Wikisyntax for the Monastery

        I would be capable to do a POC without messing around with the local patch system

        Can you elaborate on that?