in reply to Re^5: Ideas for "fixing" PerlMonks 1.0
in thread Ideas for "fixing" PerlMonks 1.0

FWIW I have working and long tested code for the whole process of a safe password reset. (100/day over 9 years)

Still needs to be tested in a second phase, if PM can be migrated to hashed (and longer) passwords.

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
see Wikisyntax for the Monastery

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Ideas for "fixing" PerlMonks 1.0
by jdporter (Paladin) on Dec 18, 2024 at 17:17 UTC

    I extend the same offer to you. Let me know what table(s) you need, and then we can start creating the code nodes.

      It's still work because I have to strip and rewrite things, (like passwords rules which are not enforced here + JS to check the passwords) and other proprietary stuff.

      I'm not very motivated to start a lengthy process if the monastery was not capable to hash the passwords in the first place.

      What would be the migration path?

      And I need to know the main mailing interface of PM. Seems like different gods implemented multiple attempts.¹

      Last but not least I would need a Dev environment to test effectively.

      Do I have the possibility to copy code into a node and run it directly?²

      It's a one file CGI, squeezing it into one node should be easy.

      Cheers Rolf
      (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
      see Wikisyntax for the Monastery

      Updates

      ¹) I can't find the code for Everything::MAIL.pm

      ²) or the right to locally apply patches

        I'm not very motivated to start a lengthy process if the monastery was not capable to hash the passwords in the first place.

        Then don't. But don't then complain when others take the same attitude.

        I need to know the main mailing interface of PM.

        That's the sort of thing I was referring to when I said I'd help with any interfacing to the framework. Since I'm helping you, we'll use my preferred way. ;-)

        I would need a Dev environment to test effectively.

        Not going to happen (unfortunately). Is it a deal-breaker?

        Do I have the possibility to copy code into a node and run it directly?

        I will make you a new htmlcode node. You submit patches to it.