Re^5: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks

The From: says noreply@, because you can't reply to that address.

The Reply-To: is a different address and domain, because you cannot send mail with From at a Google property without being Google (or whitelisted by them).

Comment on Re^5: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks by LanX (Saint) on Dec 22, 2024 at 14:16 UTC
If I see `From: noreply@` I won't even think of replying. And the `Reply-To:` isn't displayed by default by my mailclient. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) see Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^7: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks by hippo (Archbishop) on Dec 23, 2024 at 09:27 UTC
I won't even think of replying. Well call me uncommunicative but I wouldn't even think of replying to an automated password reminder, whatever the address. What on earth would you have to say to the passwordbot? 🦛	[reply]
Re^8: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks by LanX (Saint) on Dec 23, 2024 at 09:42 UTC
That's why it's weird to me and would uptick my spam-detector heuristic. IMHO the mail-text should either reflect that replies are possible or replies should go to bin. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) see Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply]
Re^7: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks by jdporter (Paladin) on Dec 23, 2024 at 03:15 UTC
what you do based on what you see has nothing to do with how your mail client decides what to hide from you. Today's latest and greatest software contains tomorrow's zero day exploits.	[reply]