Re^4: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks

> What is wrong about the reply-to?

Well it's "weird" because

> I'll look into the SPF when I get to it.

Thanks.

I'll try to find out if that's also a problem with ACT.

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

see Wikisyntax for the Monastery}

Comment on Re^4: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks by Corion (Patriarch) on Dec 22, 2024 at 14:05 UTC
The `From:` says `noreply@`, because you can't reply to that address. The `Reply-To:` is a different address and domain, because you cannot send mail with `From` at a Google property without being Google (or whitelisted by them).	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^6: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks by LanX (Saint) on Dec 22, 2024 at 14:16 UTC
If I see `From: noreply@` I won't even think of replying. And the `Reply-To:` isn't displayed by default by my mailclient. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) see Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^7: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks by hippo (Archbishop) on Dec 23, 2024 at 09:27 UTC
I won't even think of replying. Well call me uncommunicative but I wouldn't even think of replying to an automated password reminder, whatever the address. What on earth would you have to say to the passwordbot? 🦛	[reply]
Re^8: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks by LanX (Saint) on Dec 23, 2024 at 09:42 UTC
Re^7: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks by jdporter (Paladin) on Dec 23, 2024 at 03:15 UTC
what you do based on what you see has nothing to do with how your mail client decides what to hide from you. Today's latest and greatest software contains tomorrow's zero day exploits.	[reply]