in reply to Re^2: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks
in thread Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks (UPDATE: FIXED)

What is wrong about the reply-to? This is our shared mailbox.

I'll look into the SPF when I get to it.

  • Comment on Re^3: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks
by LanX (Saint) on Dec 22, 2024 at 12:30 UTC
    > What is wrong about the reply-to?

    Well it's "weird" because

    • the FROM says noreply@
    • it might raise the is-spam probability
    > I'll look into the SPF when I get to it.

    Thanks.

    I'll try to find out if that's also a problem with ACT.

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
    see Wikisyntax for the Monastery

[reply]
[d/l]

      The From: says noreply@, because you can't reply to that address.

      The Reply-To: is a different address and domain, because you cannot send mail with From at a Google property without being Google (or whitelisted by them).

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]
        If I see
        • From: noreply@
        I won't even think of replying.

        And the

        • Reply-To:
        isn't displayed by default by my mailclient.

        Cheers Rolf
        (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
        see Wikisyntax for the Monastery

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion