in reply to Re: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks
in thread Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks (UPDATE: FIXED)

Well it's known that gmail has extreme restrictions to block potential spam.

But I noticed that the emails are not from vroom personal address anymore.

Do you also see these headers? 

 
From: noreply@perlmonks.org
...
Reply-To: perlmonks.org@gmail.com
Subject: new user mail

[download]

The Reply-To seems weird ...

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
see Wikisyntax for the Monastery

update

there seem to be problems with the Sender_Policy_Framework records

Received: from vps918.pairvps.com (vps918.pairvps.com '216.92.237.59') (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.108.41.115 (trex/6.10.3); Sat, 21 Dec 2024 16:15:09 +0000
Authentication-Results: inbound.mailchannels.net; spf=softfail smtp.mailfrom=noreply@perlmonks.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; arc=none
Received-SPF: softfail (dmarc-service-d558c74bc-btzhz: transitioning perlmonks.org does not designate 216.92.237.59 as permitted sender) client-ip=216.92.237.59; envelope-from=noreply@perlmonks.org; helo=vps918.pairvps.com;
Received: by vps918.pairvps.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 10DE91A0F8E; Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:15:04 -0500 (EST)

AND ... 

SPF record lookup and validation for: perlmonks.org

SPF records are published in DNS as TXT records.

The TXT records found for your domain are:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:216.92.34.25 ip4:66.39.54.27 ~all

Checking to see if there is a valid SPF record.

Found v=spf1 record for perlmonks.org:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:216.92.34.25 ip4:66.39.54.27 ~all

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks
by erzuuli (Cannon) on Dec 21, 2024 at 18:57 UTC
[reply]
Re^3: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks
by Corion (Patriarch) on Dec 22, 2024 at 07:17 UTC

    What is wrong about the reply-to? This is our shared mailbox.

    I'll look into the SPF when I get to it.

[reply]
      > What is wrong about the reply-to?

      Well it's "weird" because

      • the FROM says noreply@
      • it might raise the is-spam probability
      > I'll look into the SPF when I get to it.

      Thanks.

      I'll try to find out if that's also a problem with ACT.

      Cheers Rolf
      (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
      see Wikisyntax for the Monastery

[reply]
[d/l]

        The From: says noreply@, because you can't reply to that address.

        The Reply-To: is a different address and domain, because you cannot send mail with From at a Google property without being Google (or whitelisted by them).

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion