in reply to Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks (UPDATE: FIXED)

  1. I tried it out
  2. didn't receive password reminder
  3. changed email address to non-google domain
  4. retried
  5. received mail
So, the problem is probably with gmail.
  • Comment on Re: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Problems getting e-mails from Perlmonks
by LanX (Saint) on Dec 21, 2024 at 18:09 UTC
    Well it's known that gmail has extreme restrictions to block potential spam.

    But I noticed that the emails are not from vroom personal address anymore.

    Do you also see these headers? 

     
From: noreply@perlmonks.org
...
Reply-To: perlmonks.org@gmail.com
Subject: new user mail

    [download]

    The Reply-To seems weird ...

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
    see Wikisyntax for the Monastery

    update

    there seem to be problems with the Sender_Policy_Framework records

    Received: from vps918.pairvps.com (vps918.pairvps.com '216.92.237.59') (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.108.41.115 (trex/6.10.3); Sat, 21 Dec 2024 16:15:09 +0000
Authentication-Results: inbound.mailchannels.net; spf=softfail smtp.mailfrom=noreply@perlmonks.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; arc=none
Received-SPF: softfail (dmarc-service-d558c74bc-btzhz: transitioning perlmonks.org does not designate 216.92.237.59 as permitted sender) client-ip=216.92.237.59; envelope-from=noreply@perlmonks.org; helo=vps918.pairvps.com;
Received: by vps918.pairvps.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 10DE91A0F8E; Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:15:04 -0500 (EST)

    AND ... 

    SPF record lookup and validation for: perlmonks.org

SPF records are published in DNS as TXT records.

The TXT records found for your domain are:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:216.92.34.25 ip4:66.39.54.27 ~all

Checking to see if there is a valid SPF record.

Found v=spf1 record for perlmonks.org:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:216.92.34.25 ip4:66.39.54.27 ~all
[reply]
[d/l]
[reply]

      What is wrong about the reply-to? This is our shared mailbox.

      I'll look into the SPF when I get to it.

[reply]
        > What is wrong about the reply-to?

        Well it's "weird" because

        • the FROM says noreply@
        • it might raise the is-spam probability
        > I'll look into the SPF when I get to it.

        Thanks.

        I'll try to find out if that's also a problem with ACT.

        Cheers Rolf
        (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
        see Wikisyntax for the Monastery

[reply]
[d/l]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion