in reply to Re: HTTP::Cookies -> CookieJar
in thread HTTP::Cookies -> CookieJar

The use of HTTP::CookieJar is recommended over HTTP::Cookies
Recommended by whom?
LWP::UserAgent has 2 places in it's docs that encourage user's to switch: And LIMITATIONS of HTTP::Cookies implies it.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: HTTP::Cookies -> CookieJar
by hrcerq (Monk) on Apr 02, 2025 at 00:57 UTC

    Something that got me confused here is this: you're concerned about recommendations from LWP::UserAgent docs when instead you picked HTTP::Tiny for the task. But anyway, HTTP::Tiny also mentions this:

    Cookie support requires HTTP::CookieJar or an equivalent class.

    return on_success() or die;